As debate intensifies over federal funding for university research, a broader question is emerging about who should drive American innovation. Should taxpayers help fund breakthroughs in science and technology, or should market forces determine what research moves forward?
In this episode of You Might Be Right, former Tennessee Governors Phil Bredesen and Bill Haslam explore that question with Jeffrey Miron and Aldo Musacchio.
 |  |  |  |  |
Miron, vice president for research at Cato Institute and director of graduate and undergraduate studies in the Department of Economics at Harvard, argues there is little evidence that federal R&D spending drives long-term productivity growth. He contends that government incentives can shape university priorities in unintended ways and believes markets should play a larger role in determining research investments.
Musacchio, professor of management and economics at Brandeis International Business School, takes a different view. He supports targeted federal incentives that encourage private-sector investment, arguing that short-term public funding can accelerate innovation while avoiding excessive political influence.
Bredesen and Haslam weigh the trade-offs between public and private support for research, including implications for training future scientists, maintaining U.S. competitiveness, and deciding which innovations warrant public investment.
Subscribe and follow You Might be Right wherever you get your audio content – including Apple Podcasts and Spotify – to never miss an episode, or sign up for our email list to receive new episodes straight to your inbox each week here.