Who decides what a congressional district looks like, and what does it mean for voters when politicians get to choose their constituents instead of the other way around?
In this episode of You Might Be Right, former Tennessee Governors Phil Bredesen and Bill Haslam examine the politics of redistricting with Jonathan Rodden and Sam Wang, exploring what makes a map fair, how geography and political decisions shape representation, and what newly drawn districts could mean for elections ahead.
 |  |  |  |  |
Rodden, a professor of political science at Stanford University, explains why partisan gerrymandering is only part of the equation. Where voters live and how they are geographically distributed can influence representation even when maps are drawn without partisan intent. He also discusses why state-by-state reforms may not be enough to address the issue and what federal standards could accomplish.
Wang, founder of the Princeton Gerrymandering Project and Electoral Innovation Lab, brings a data-driven perspective to fairness. He discusses how mathematical tools can evaluate district maps and whether alternatives such as multi-member districts could reduce the effects of gerrymandering.
For Bredesen and Haslam, who both experienced redistricting as governors, the conversation underscores how difficult it can be to define a “fair” map, let alone create one. They consider whether the current system needs to change and return to a fundamental question: Do voters really choose their representatives if politicians can choose their voters?
Subscribe and follow You Might be Right wherever you get your audio content – including Apple Podcasts and Spotify – to never miss an episode, or sign up for our email list to receive new episodes straight to your inbox each week here.