• Request Info
  • Visit
  • Apply
  • Give
  • Request Info
  • Visit
  • Apply
  • Give

Search

  • A-Z Index
  • Map

Baker School

Baker Blog Prospective Students
  • Overview
    • History
    • Board
    • Howard Baker Archives
    • Facilities & Reservations
  • People
    • Baker School Faculty
    • Baker School Staff
    • CETEP Faculty & Experts
    • NSFA Faculty & Experts
  • Undergraduate
    • Major
    • Minor
    • 5-Year Program
    • Baker LLC
    • Prospective Students
    • Admitted Students
    • Advising & Resources
    • Certificates
  • Graduate
    • MPP
    • MPA
    • Capstone Projects
    • Graduate Certificates
    • Dual Degree Program
    • Online Degree Program
  • Centers
    • Institute of American Civics
    • Energy, Transportation & Environmental Policy
      • Energy and Environment Forums
    • National Security & Foreign Affairs
  • News & Events
    • Events
      • The Dedication of the Howard H. Baker Jr. School of Public Policy and Public Affairs
      • Election 2024: Economics in Focus
      • Civic Leadership Lecture Series: The Myth of Left and Right
      • Civic Leadership Lecture Series: The Truth-Seeking Mission of the University
      • Election 2024: Foreign Policy in Focus
      • Election 2024: Supreme Court in Focus
      • Civic Leadership Lecture Series: Is the American Dream Dying?
      • Fall 2023 Tuesday in the Toyota Events
    • News
  • Student Engagement
    • Travel Programs
    • Professional Development
      • Baker Mentoring Program
    • Student Organizations
    • Student Research
    • Baker Ambassadors
  • Podcast
    • Season 1
    • Season 2
    • Season 3
    • Season 4
    • Season 5
    • Season 6
You Might Be Right Logo

Podcast

Is this the end of free trade?

Is this the end of free trade?

March 6, 2025

Over the past 10 years, America’s economic growth has dramatically outpaced the rest of the developed world. American voters, however, have shifted away from favoring the sort of free market policies that characterized American trade in the post-World War II era, and towards more restrictive policies that economists suggest with lower economic growth, domestically and abroad.

To kick off a new season of You Might Be Right, our hosts, former Tennessee Governors Phil Bredesen and Bill Haslam, discuss trade policy and the impact of tariffs with Heather Long, opinion columnist at The Washington Post, and James Lake, associate professor of economics at the University of Tennessee. Are economists wrong about the gains from lower barriers to trade or are Americans increasingly prioritizing other things in determining how we will trade with the rest of the world?

Download Transcript
Sign Up for Podcast Updates

Subscribe and follow You Might be Right wherever you get your audio content – including Apple Podcasts and Spotify – to never miss an episode, or sign up for our email list to receive new episodes straight to your inbox each week here.

“A tariff is nothing other than a tax on imports”

The conversation kicked off with a discussion about how tariffs work. Who pays for them?

“A tariff is nothing other than a tax on imports,” Lake explained. “If the foreign exporter in the other country that’s selling here to the US doesn’t change their price, then the tariff would pass fully through to us, as US consumers. There’s a chance that the foreign exporter may take a discount, and so then, the tariff wouldn’t fully pass through to us as consumers, but at the end of the day, it’s a tax on imports, and the price of the imported good will go up.”

It’s not all bad news, though. “On the flip side, the potential benefit is that the tariff is going to stimulate domestic production on the goods that are hit with tariffs,” he added. “Now that the foreign exporter is facing the tariff, the price has gone up on imported goods. Domestic producers can use that as a bit of a shield to raise their own prices as well.”

“Short-term win versus what the long-term strategy is”

The group then turned to another pressing question: Are tariffs an effective negotiating tactic?

While acknowledging “there are so many different answers to this question,” Long emphasized the importance of having a clear, long-term strategy.

“I think what’s really tricky here is you can’t just threaten tariffs every month and expect to get a concession again and again,” she said.  “At some point…people get tired, particularly if they felt like they were a friend of the United States and an ally of the United States, of being threatened with these tariffs, and they’re going to find new trading partners or they’re going to find new markets or they’re going to find ways around these tariffs. And so I think there’s sort of a short-term win versus what the long-term strategy is, and that’s where there’s a lot of frustration around what President Trump is doing.”

Long noted that one scenario where we might need a different approach is in dealing with China, which “plays by totally different economic policy rules.”

“So what do you do when you have someone like China who is completely so far away from free market economics? Do you punish them? Do you fight back?” she said. “I think that’s been a real awakening in Washington and a sea change in the past decade.”

“There’s always winners and losers”

Asked what potential trade policy changes they would prioritize to balance national security, economic, and labor concerns, both Long and Lake shared a variety of ideas.

Long noted that in addition to tariffs, another way to offer support and protection to certain industries is through investments. “Some of this is also about countering China and other nations by strategically investing some money from our federal government into these key industries of tomorrow,” she said.

Lake urged an emphasis on developing a better understanding of how trade policy can have adverse impacts that are concentrated on certain groups of people, noting “lots of people are upset with trade policy, lots of people have lost.”

“The free market doesn’t say that everyone in the US is going to be a winner,” he explained. “The free market says that there’s always winners and losers from price changes. We need to understand that and better identify where are those losers going to be? Are they concentrated to a particular type of worker, to a particular type of location? Especially a particular type of location, because there can be a lot of costs there. And in particular, that can really affect public policy for generations to come, and that’s what we’re seeing today.”

Subscribe and follow You Might be Right wherever you get your audio content – including Apple Podcasts and Spotify – to never miss an episode, or sign up for our email list to receive new episodes straight to your inbox each week here.

Baker School's You Might Be Right, hosted by Gov. Phil Bredesen and Gov. Bill Haslam

Join the conversation on Twitter by following @UTBakerSchool, @PhilBredesen, and @BillHaslam.

More Episodes

Can government work better and cost less?
March 18, 2025
Has Pardon Power Gone Too Far?
April 1, 2025
How Important Are Foreign Alliances?
April 15, 2025
Can We Still Count on the Separation of Powers?
April 29, 2025
Is Public Education in Crisis?
May 13, 2025

Filed Under: News, Podcast Season 6

“I increasingly believe that the essence of leadership ... is to be an eloquent listener.”
—Howard H. Baker Jr.

Request Info

Give

Podcast

Baker School

1640 Cumberland Avenue
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996-3340
Phone: 865-974-0931
Fax: 865-974-3889
Email: bakerschool@utk.edu

X Icon    Facebook Icon    LinkedIn Icon    Instagram Icon    YouTube Icon

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Knoxville, Tennessee 37996
865-974-1000

The flagship campus of the University of Tennessee System and partner in the Tennessee Transfer Pathway.

ADA Privacy Safety Title IX